OUR
COUNTRY'S
CITY
dwellers
have
access
to
machine-made
white
bread.
The
production
of
white
bread
from
refined
flour
or
maida
takes
place
by
eradicating
Vitamins
of
minerals
in
the
process.
The
final
product,
white
bread,
is
pleasant
to
taste,
but
causes
havoc
with
the
teeth.
On
the
other
hand
it
adversely
effect
the
digestive
system.
Whole
wheat
contains
besides
the
usual
carbohydrates,
vitamins
and
minerals.
The
vitamins
are
concentrated
in
the
outer
layer
of
the
kernel.
Refining
retains
mainly
the
carbohydrates,
and
eliminates
most
of
the
vitamins.
Both
zinc
and
cadmium
are
found
in
wheat
grain:
the
zinc
in
the
outer
layer,
the
cadmium
in
the
grain
centre.
Milling
removes
the
zinc,
but
retains
the
cadmium:
beneficial
is
eradicated,
the
malignant
is
maintained.
The
final
product
lasts
longer
since
even
the
oils
are
lost,
but
it
is
without
fiber.
This
is
an
unwanted
development
since
fiber
less
paste
sticks
in
the
crevices
of
the
teeth
and
causes
caries.
It
also
leads
to
constipation.
But
like
white
sugar,
and
like
satellites,
VCRs
and
airports,
white
bread
is
another
major
symbol
of
modern
civilization.
Having
discovered
that
the
technology
that
produces
white
bread
also
ruins
it
nutritionally,
millers
in
western
countries
now
add
synthetic
vitamins
and
minerals
to
the
flour
they
use
to
make
bread.
So
we
have
'vitamin-enriched'
bread!
Technology
first
eliminates
the
vitamins
and
minerals
from
the
flour,
and
then
shores
it
up
through
synthetic
inputs.
Poleszynski's
United
Nations
University
study
concludes
that
the
best
way
to
relate
to
wheat
and
flour
is
the
Indian
way.
Rudolf
Ballantine
writes:
'The
Indians
continue,
as
they
have
done
for
thousands
of
years,
to
quietly
grind
their
flour
with
stone
mills
and
sift
out
the
coarsets
5
percent
producing
a
bread
(roti,
chapati
and
phulka)
both
wholesome
and
digestible.
It
seems
likely
that
this
process
approaches
the
ideal,
and
there
is
no
reason
why
modern
steel
roller
mills
could
not
be
adapted
to
produce
a
similar
product.
The
periodic
visits
made
by
our
roti-eaters
to
the
flour
mill
are
necessitated
by
the
fact
that
the
germ
of
the
wheat
contains
oils.
Consequently,
whole
wheat
flour,
from
which
such
oils
have
not
been
removed,
tends
to
go
rancid.
Since
whole
grains
do
not
spoil
for
years,
it
makes
sense
to
mill
only
small
amounts
at
a
time.
The
solution
on
the
whole
is
modest,
ingenious.
But
it
is
unglamorous.
What
is
modern
must
be
welcomed,
otherwise
people
will
say
we
are
living
in
the
eighteenth
century
and
not
in
the
twenty-first!
Besides,
we
have
so
many
dental
colleges,
and
their
products
suffer
from
an
unemployment
problem.
The
proliferation
of
caries
among
the
population
could
keep
all
dentists
gainfully
employed,
and
add
to
economic
growth.
The
periodic
milling
to
wheat
by
Indian
households
is
a
prime
example
of
an
older
technology
that
cannot
be
updated
or
improved
by
modern
science.
It
is
in
fact
a
form
of
permanent
or
constantly
unhappy
with
itself,
continuously
engaged
in
modifying
its
technologies
till
we
have
reached
a
point
where
such
modification
has
become
an
end
in
itself.
Once
modification
itself
becomes
a
source
of
profit,
it
seems
a
natural
process,
something
the
human
species
has
always
been
doing
since
it
felt
the
need
for
technology.
Fortunately,
a
large
number
of
people
intend
to
preserve
the
older
system
of
milling
their
wheat
to
prepare
their
rotis.
They
may
not
know
that
their
habits
have
recently
been
vindicated
in
world
forums
such
as
the
UNU.
But
this
does
not
matter.
More
important
is
the
planner's
prejudice,
which,
as
in
the
case
of
sugar,
has
blindly
convinced
him
that
large-scale
sugar
factories
and
flour
mills
are
the
answers
to
modern
India's
needs.
Such
opinions
are
getting
increasingly
difficult
to
maintain
in
the
light
of
more
knowledge.
But
the
bondage
to
modernity
is
of
a
peculiar
kind.
Often,
its
alleged
superiority
or
advantage
is
thrust
upon
us
only
to
conceal
the
fact
that
some
bureaucrat
has
made
a
commission
on
some
sale
of
technology
(which
this
country
may
not
at
all
need).